The whole case · 90 seconds

It started in my family.
It ends in the United States Senate.

Arthur Brent Porter · UT Austin '87 · lifelong Republican voter · 20th year with Lyme disease

▶ Slideshow Story The Detailed Story
Or just read this page — it's the whole case, about 90 seconds.
Start here · why any of this happened

I told my father the truth. That is what set all of this in motion.

Around year sixteen of being sick, I read The Body Keeps the Score and The Myth of Normal and understood something no lab test had told me: stress you can't resolve, carried for decades, holds a body in a state where it cannot heal.

So at fifty-seven I said it out loud, in writing, with the research attached — my illness has more than one author, your part in it is real, and I can't keep carrying the whole blame so you never have to look at your share.

Everything below happened after I said that, and because I said it. This isn't a man complaining about a bad doctor. It's what happens to someone who tells the truth to people who cannot hear one.

I'm 61, in my twentieth year with Lyme disease, and I've spent nineteen months documenting this instead of getting treatment.
Support this work →
Goes to treatment and filing costs. Nothing here is for sale.
1 · what it cost

My family answered with $15,000 and a psychiatric evaluation.

After seventeen years sick, I said out loud that I wasn't being heard — and that not being heard was part of why I wasn't healing. The answer was an ultimatum: attend a psychiatric evaluation at UT's Dell Medical School, or lose all financial support. I'm on disability. I went.

That is the whole story in one line: I told the truth, and the people with the money answered by putting me on trial for it.

2 · Their own report says so

The coercion is in their paperwork — page one.

"The patient indicated that his parents had provided him with an ultimatum of either completing the evaluation or having him cut off of financial support. He acquiesced to their request." — Dell Medical School, signed final report, Chief Complaint section

Under the American Psychological Association's own rules, coercion voids consent. The evaluation was invalid before it began. They ran it anyway — and billed my family.

3 · Then they got the numbers wrong — all in one direction

A "Superior" score, written down as ordinary.

What the test manual says
129 = Superior
97th percentile — top 3%
What they wrote in the report
"Above average"
a category the manual doesn't contain

Two more scores their own report calls "exceptionally high" had the numbers left off the page entirely. Every single discrepancy moved the same way: down. Honest errors scatter. A thumb on the scale never does.

4 · And a diagnosis appeared that their own report denies

"No evidence of any mania." Then a bipolar code showed up in my file.

Years ago — we have an aunt with bipolar disorder — I had it tested. The test was negative, and I told my sister so. Three weeks before the evaluation she wrote instructing me to report "periods of mania or psychosis" to the doctors. The report says it plainly on page 2 — no mania. Yet my file carries a bipolar code I was never told about. I found it only after a federal agency forced them to hand over my own records. UT then began mailing me invitations to a bipolar research study. I'm on Medicare — that's public money moving on a diagnosis their own document says has nothing behind it.

5 · Who runs that department

The chairman is a doctor Senator Grassley investigated — twice.

Dr. Charles Nemeroff — exposed in 2008 over $1.2 million in undisclosed drug-company payments, pursued again in 2012. His life's research: how unresolved stress inflames the body and makes people sick. Which is exactly what an uncorrectable false record has done to mine, every day since.

6 · I asked everyone. Every door closed.

Six offices. One apology — from the person with the least power in the story.

Only my mother has said sorry. Not one institution has.

Two letters from the federal Office for Civil Rights, July versus December — the reversal in their own words.
The same federal office, five months apart: from "your complaint is an integral part of our enforcement efforts" to a closure with no reason given.
7 · Why this reaches Washington

The last door was federal — and federal oversight has been dismantled.

Seventeen inspectors general were fired in a single night — more than every previous president combined. Their whole job is finding wrongdoing inside an agency. Removing them doesn't stop corruption; it stops corruption from being found. The office that would have heard me still exists. It simply doesn't investigate anymore.

A small case in Texas sits closed because a large one in Washington is unresolved. That isn't a metaphor. It's the mechanism.

9 · the question I can't stop asking

This happened to me with a 97th-percentile brain and every document saved. How many people can't fight back?

I had the reasoning to catch it, the records to prove it, nineteen months to fight it — and a federal agency was still required just to show me my own file.

That program lets any third party pay for an evaluation of another adult. Access came through a family friend who attends our church and sits on the medical school's behavioral health advisory board — a door most people don't have. And the office meant to investigate this kind of thing has stopped investigating.

The people without the documents, the stamina, or the test scores are not going to raise their hands. That is exactly why I'm raising mine.

It's the same act at every scale:
someone tells the truth,
and the powerful person answers by
discrediting the one who said it.

8 · The pattern, in three steps

My father. My university. My government.

My father taught me truth-telling is non-negotiable — then, when I used it on him, wrote to me: "there are times when not telling the truth is better."

Dell Medical was told in writing that I was there under coercion and had active infections. They finished the paperwork instead.

The President fires, sues, or disbands anyone who holds him to account — inspectors general, prosecutors, generals — and the Senate, which holds the one remedy the Framers built for exactly this, has not used it.

What I'm asking of the United States Senate

  1. Get it in writing. No confirmation vote for an Attorney General on verbal promises alone — the President has already contradicted them in public.
  2. Say the outwait plan is illegitimate. Withdrawing a nomination to keep a man in the job "until those senators are out of office" makes the Senate's consent optional.
  3. Let the impeachment articles move. H.Res. 353 and H.Res. 939 are already written and filed. Not a promised verdict — a real process. James Madison named impeachment as the answer to exactly this situation, at the founding.
  4. Answer one citizen. Ask the Inspector General why a complaint has sat since February about a doctor a sitting senator already investigated twice.

If not now — when?

Want the full record, with every document and quote?

The Detailed Story Letter to Grassley Cornyn Tillis Thune The Documents Email chronology & case file

Arthur "Brent" Porter · Native Texan · B.A. Computer Science, UT Austin 1987
Great-grandson of an Oklahoma sharecropper who farmed corn
bowandvector.com